In a major growth within the ongoing In re Pork Antitrust Litigation, Triumph Meals has been granted the unique alternative to revisit abstract judgment by the U.S. District Courtroom of Minnesota. On October 8, Decide John R. Tunheim permitted Triumph’s request to reopen the abstract judgment part—whereas denying related requests from all different defendants.
In line with filings made on October 22, Triumph Meals submitted a movement and memorandum to additional transient the Courtroom. This might doubtlessly result in Triumph’s exit from the long-running litigation.
Assertion from Matt England, President & CEO, Triumph Meals
“We respect that the Courtroom has reopened this concern. Triumph is totally different than others located on this litigation, as we don’t personal pig farms and don’t deal with pork gross sales. Persevering with to be caught within the litigation is harming the profitable breakaway our firm constructed from the bigger trade.”
Business Implications
Triumph’s place underscores a key differentiator in its construction and function throughout the pork provide chain. By distancing itself from possession and direct pork gross sales, Triumph is searching for authorized recognition of its distinctive standing within the market.
This growth will probably be intently watched throughout the trade, as it might influence authorized precedent and the remaining defendants on this case.
